Application of metaanalysis in clinical trials, continued 2 1 each study effect size the first step in metaanalysis calculation is to get the effect size estimation for each study. Heterogeneity in metaanalysis q, isquare statsdirect. For the above metaanalysis, the null hypothesis states. Evaluation of old and new tests of heterogeneity in. Quantifying systematic heterogeneity in metaanalysis. Abstract metaanalysis has developed to be a most important tool in evaluation research. Randomised or quasirandomised trials that evaluated interventions to prevent falls and injuries were included. We calculate the bias of i2, focusing on the situation where the number of studies in the meta analysis is small. We calculate the bias of i2, focusing on the situation where the number of studies in the metaanalysis is small.
In meta analysis, the fraction of variance that is due to heterogeneity is estimated by the statistic i2. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta analysis of rcts using standard and generalised q statistics. X2 the value which we expect chisquared to have if there is no heterogeneity is equal to its degrees of freedom. Meta analysis of epidemiological doseresponse studies 2nd italian stata users group meeting october 1011, 2005 nicola orsini institute environmental medicine, karolinska institutet rino bellocco dept. Upgrades to the program and manual will be available on our download site. Biased heterogeneity estimates in metaanalysis 3 true heterogeneity. Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in meta. New methodological approaches, such as realist synthesis, mixed methods approaches which incorporate qualitative and other kinds of data along with quantitative synthesis, and qualitative comparative analysis, are also promising ways of negotiating heterogeneity 12 14. Heterogeneity in metaanalyses of genomewide association. The data set is stored in the open science framework. A so called random effects metaanalysis was performed because of the presence of statistical heterogeneity c is true. Researchers undertook a metaanalysis to evaluate the effectiveness of multifactorial assessment and intervention programmes in preventing falls and injuries among older people. In an attempt to establish whether studies are consistent, reports of meta analyses commonly present a statisti cal test of heterogeneity. Calculation of effect size between two means can be done by three measures.
Heterogeneity in metaanalysis 207 the tests that have been publicized in the statistical and epidemiologic literature. In metaanalysis, the fraction of variance that is due to heterogeneity is estimated by the statistic i2. Comprehensive metaanalysis is extremely easy to use and understand and it is a terrific product. This chapter describes smallstudy effects in metaanalysis and how the issues they raise may be addressed. Jun, 2012 the traditional statistical test for heterogeneity is cochrans q test. A comparison of the heterogeneity of the largest studies vs. The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the.
Meta analysis seeks to understand heterogeneity in addition to computing a summary risk estimate. From the standpoint that heterogeneity is inevitable in a metaanalysis, we are left with the question of whether there is an acceptable degree of heterogeneity. Statsdirect calls statistics for measuring heterogentiy in meta analysis noncombinability statistics in order to help the user to interpret the results. Cheung national university of singapore metaanalysis and structural equation modeling sem are two important statistical methods in the behavioral, social, and medical sciences. If all studies in an analysis shared the same true effect size, so that. Some general points on the measure of heterogeneity in. The recently updated cochrane handbook now gives overlapping rather than mutually exclusive regions for low, moderate and high heterogeneity, but when the heterogeneity is measured with as much uncertainty as in the cervix 3 metaanalysis 90% reference intervals for of 0% to 93% any categorisation feels dubious. A model for integrating fixed, random, and mixedeffects metaanalyses into structural equation modeling mike w. We would not expect the observed effects to be identical to each other but because of withinstudy error, we would expect each to fall within some range of the common effect. Small studies are more heterogeneous than large ones. To quantify the heterogeneity we partition the observed variance. The data set also includes information about the number and type of effect sizes, the q and i 2statistics, and publication bias.
A metaanalysis integrates the quantitative findings from separate but similar studies and provides a numerical estimate of the overall effect of interest petrie et al. Hi all, i am using metal for meta analysis of some specific snps 6 snps of interest across three studies. Different weights are assigned to the different studies for calculating the summary or pooled effect. The extent of heterogeneity in a metaanalysis partly determines the difficulty in drawing overall conclusions. If all studies in an analysis shared the same true effect size, so that true heterogeneity is zero. While there is some consensus on methods for investigating statistical and methodological heterogeneity, little attention has been paid to clinical aspects of heterogeneity. Need for consistency assessment of the consistency of effects across studies is an essential part of meta analysis. Mar 16, 2015 the results for the test of heterogeneity for the metaanalysis of fall related injuries are displayed towards the bottom of the forest plot in the line test for heterogeneity. Heterogeneity in meta analysis heterogeneity in meta analysis refers to the variation in study outcomes between studies. Under a fixedeffects model these variances and expectations refer only to the k effects.
Smallstudy effects is a generic term for the phenomenon that smaller studies sometimes show different, often larger, treatment effects than large ones. If too much heterogeneity, dont do a metaanalysis of all studies understand why heterogeneity exists. Metaanalysis gives us a more detailed understanding of a topic. However, the magnitude of heterogeneity differs across metaanalyses. In this lecture we look at how to deal with it when we have it. Determining how substantial heterogeneity is is an important aspect of ma. The last of these is quantified by the i 2statistic. Study name statistics for each study odds ratio and 95% ci odds lower upper ratio limit limit morton 0. Meta analyses are increasingly applied to synthesize data from genomewide association gwa studies and from other teams that try to replicate the genetic variants that emerge from such investigations. Metaanalysis is a statistical method for combining a collection of effect estimates from multiple separate studies higgins and green, 2008, and it. Cohens d, hedges g, and glass delta using formulas below. The historical roots of meta analysis can be traced back to 17th century studies of astronomy, while a paper published in 1904 by the statistician karl pearson in the british medical journal which collated data from several studies of typhoid inoculation is seen as the first time a meta analytic approach was used to aggregate the outcomes of multiple clinical studies. Draft please do not quote michael borenstein julian p.
Therefore, we also investigated the association between trial size defined as in section 2. Hence i2 is percentage of the chisquared statistic which. Meta analysis methods 344 example of psychometric meta analysis 346 comparison of artifact correction with meta regression 348 sources of information about artifact values 349 how heterogeneity is assessed 349 reporting in psychometric meta analysis 350 concluding remarks 351 summary points 351 part 9. This heterogeneity may be of clinical, methodological or statistical origin. It will also be expanded to include chapters covering conceptual topics. A metaanalysis may be conducted on several clinical trials of a medical treatment, in an effort to obtain a better understanding of how well treatments work. We have developed a new quantity, i2, which we believe gives a better measure of the consistency between trials in a meta analysis. Backgroundmetaanalysis is the systematic and quantitative synthesis of effect sizes and the exploration of their diversity across different studies. Which is the preferred measure of heterogeneity juniper publishers. Fixed effects metaanalysis assumes all studies are estimating the same. A model for integrating fixed, random, and mixedeffects.
The historical roots of metaanalysis can be traced back to 17th century studies of astronomy, while a paper published in 1904 by the statistician karl pearson in the british medical journal which collated data from several studies of typhoid inoculation is seen as the first time a metaanalytic approach was used to aggregate the outcomes of multiple clinical studies. Randomeffects metaanalyses are used to combine evidence of treatment effects from multiple studies. Although clinical trial registries have been established to reduce nonpublication, the results from over half of all trials registered in clinicaltrials. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity. Various heterogeneity measures were compared on the basis of theoretical criteria as well as their analytical. Estimates of heterogeneity i can be biased in small meta. Metaanalysis with linear and nonlinear multilevel models. We investigated, using simulated studies, the accuracy of i 2 in the assessment of heterogeneity and the effects of heterogeneity on the predictive value of metaanalyses. This extent may be measured by estimating a betweenstudy variance, but interpretation is then specific to a particular treatment effect metric. The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on. Stata module to quantify heterogeneity in a meta analysis, statistical software components s449201, boston college department of economics, revised 25 jan 2006. Regardless of whether or not you are a statistician, the software leads you to the world of metaanalysis quickly. Metaanalysis methods 344 example of psychometric metaanalysis 346 comparison of artifact correction with metaregression 348 sources of information about artifact values 349 how heterogeneity is assessed 349 reporting in psychometric metaanalysis 350 concluding remarks 351 summary points 351 part 9. Metaanalyses are increasingly applied to synthesize data from genomewide association gwa studies and from other teams that try to replicate the genetic variants that emerge from such investigations.
Hi all, i am using metal for metaanalysis of some specific snps 6 snps of interest across three studies. Pdf dealing with clinical heterogeneity in metaanalysis. Hypothesis testing starts at the position of statistical homogeneity. Metaanalysis of epidemiological doseresponse studies. This strategy effectively documents design heterogeneity, thus improving the practice of meta analysis by aiding in.
Estimates of betweenstudy heterogeneity for 705 meta. Subgroup analyses were the most commonly reported analysis 54%. Ideally, the studies whose results are being combined in the metaanalysis should all be undertaken in the same way and to the same experimental protocols. Evidencebased mapping of design heterogeneity prior to meta. The heterogeneity statistic i 2 can be biased in small meta. In the last 25 years meta analysis has been widely accepted in the social and health sciences as a very useful research methodology to quantitatively integrate the results of a collection of single studies on a given topic. Backgroundmeta analysis is the systematic and quantitative synthesis of effect sizes and the exploration of their diversity across different studies. A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. If statistical heterogeneity had not existed that is, if statistical homogeneity had existed, a fixed effects metaanalysis would have been undertaken. In statistics, study heterogeneity is a problem that can arise when attempting to undertake a meta analysis. In this respect, higgins i2 has emerged to be one of the most used and, potentially, one of the most. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta. Systematic heterogeneity can arise in a metaanalysis due to differences in the study characteristics of participating studies. Ideally, the studies whose results are being combined in the meta analysis should all be undertaken in the same way and to the same experimental protocols.
Q is included in each statsdirect metaanalysis function because it forms part of the dersimonianlaird random effects pooling method dersimonian and laird 1985. We searched databases medline, embase, cinahl, cochrane library, and consort, to. Variance between studies in a metaanalysis will exist. The heterogeneity statistic i 2 can be biased in small. We conducted a large simulation study with a design based on the range of the key features of. Pdf quantifying heterogeneity in individual participant.
Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in metaanalysis using metaregression and pseudo data. Bringing evidence to translational medicine heterogeneity. The heterogeneity statistic i2 can be biased in small meta. This extent may be measured by estimating a between. Clinical researchers have often preferred to use a fixed effects model for the primary interpretation of a metaanalysis. Comprehensive metaanalysis is an indispensable tool for efficient problem solving in metaanalyses. By convention, the null hypothesis is rejected if the chisquare test has p pdf, also known as version of record license if available. Estimates of heterogeneity i can be biased in small. The standard model for randomeffects metaanalysis assumes approximately.
The test is performed in a similar way to traditional statistical hypothesis testing, there being a null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis. Conversely, q has too much power as a test of heterogeneity if the number of studies is large higgins et al. We present a data set containing 705 betweenstudy heterogeneity estimates. Heterogeneity is an issue that is present in almost any metaanalysis. In statistics, study heterogeneity is a problem that can arise when attempting to undertake a metaanalysis. From the within study results, i can see that results from two of the studies are in the same direction while the. My own view is that any amount of heterogeneity is acceptable, providing both that the predefined eligibility criteria for the metaanalysis are sound and that the data are correct. Please clarify why we need q,i2,d2 etc is it to help decide on model choice or simply quantify the degree of heterogeneity or both. With a randomeffects metaanalysis, the 95% ci of the effect estimate contains the true relative risk 0. This is a very useful advantage that you have not included in your blog. The intervention had to be delivered to individual patients, not at a. Assessing heterogeneity in meta analysis 3 assessing heterogeneity in meta analysis.
68 627 635 164 110 766 840 1237 1240 1169 1411 150 428 1495 1406 261 5 321 274 334 558 201 372 935 786 830 1381 1478 801 170 1131 891 725 1315 1009 225 1121 174 1469 1316 54 1337 1360 1439 497 992 98 1238